Love's Real Stories

Answering all the real estate questions you never knew you had.

Aunt Ruthie

Aunt Ruthie giveth and Aunt Ruthie taketh away. Either way, we need to be prepared for The Aunt Ruthie Factor.

I became aware of The Aunt Ruthie Factor one rainy afternoon at a 1920’s California Craftsman style house, which was soon to be the new home of my clients Randy and Julie Hallman. Randy and Julie loved the house and knick-named it “Our Heart’s Desire”. We were now in the inspection phase of their purchase, and they brought Randy’s Aunt Ruthie by for a look. Aunt Ruthie, from my perspective, was a four-foot tall umbrella with feet that skittered like a sand crab from the street to the house. When she crawled out from under her umbrella and revealed the entirety of her person, I stepped backward involuntarily; she bore the facial features of the stereotypical witch, warts-and-all.

“We love the hardwood floors, Aunt Ruthie,” said Julie, “and isn’t the kitchen cute?”

Aunt Ruthie stumped around the place wagging her head, muttering “No; no; no.” We cancelled escrow that day.

My mentor, the wise old KDV, commiserated with me later. “Ah, yes, my son,” he said, “you’ve been done in by the family deal-killer syndrome. That, my friend, is a force for which we in the sales world have no defense. Matters of blood relations are stronger than the surging tides, babe.”

Two months later, it was time again to implement the Aunt Ruthie Factor. Randy and Julie fell in love with another home, a neglected two-story Queen Ann Victorian. We were silent as Aunt Ruthie inspected. Julie clasped her hands under her chin. Aunt Ruthie stood in the center of the empty living room, and a shadow appeared from the carpet, rising up her legs. I noticed the same shadow crawling up my own legs; and Randy’s; and Julie’s.

“FLEAS!”

A passerby on the street might have perceived us as an odd Irish step-dancing quartet, except without timing or syncopation, as we high-stepped out the front door and pranced about the front yard.

“Should I draft the cancellation-of-sale papers?” I asked.

Aunt Ruthie wagged her head. “No; no; no,” she said.

Julie said, “So that means yes? Yes! Oh yes!”

The Aunt Ruthie Factor works in strange ways.

Know It All

I called my friend, The Finance Guy.

“Hey, did you hear The California Association of Realtors published their 2014 California Housing Market Forecast?” I asked.

“But of course,” he said. “I’m fully aware of their so-called forecast. I was given access to the report prior to its publication, and I was consulted as to the level of its accuracy and the caliber of the information therein.”

I shouldn’t have been surprised. The Finance Guy knows a lot. My friend J.P. says The Finance Guy possesses so much knowledge he’s full of it. And several of my friends are so impressed they refer to him as Mr. Know-It-All.

I told The Finance Guy the 2014 Housing Market Forecast indicates we will continue to see improvements through 2014. The C.A.R. President said, “As the economy enters the fourth year of a modest recovery, we expect to see a strong demand for homeownership as buyers who may have been competing with investors and facing an extreme shortage of available housing, return from the sidelines.”

“Rose-colored glasses, my boy,” said The Finance Guy. “Your trade organization, this C.A.R., is foisting a distorted view upon you and your kind, as they whistle through the proverbial graveyard.”

“Foisting?” I said.

“Where was your precious C.A.R. when the housing bubble burst in 2006?” he said

“Actually,” I said, “C.A.R. Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young warned us in 2004 and 2005 we were headed for a serious downturn. And weren’t you still bullish on the market in —“

“Let’s focus on the here and now, shall we? Have you seen the stock market trends lately? Have you heard of the Government Shutdown?” He delivered an impressive monologue about the government’s questionable fiscal, monetary, and housing policies.

“And actions of the Federal Reserve,” he said, “will ensure a higher interest rate environment, which will have a negative impact in the housing sector.”

I called my friend J.P. “Hey, did you hear The California Association of Realtors published their 2014 California Housing Market Forecast?” I asked.

“Yeah,” said J.P., “Leslie Appleton Young said the market continues to improve, and we’ll see moderate price increases in 2014.”

I asked him about the effect of the Government Shutdown, questionable governmental fiscal policies, and a higher interest rate environment.

“Hmm,” said J.P. “Have you been talking to Mr. Know-it-All again?”

Tiny Time

Signs of the times: A former Hummer driver, now behind the wheel of a Mini-Cooper; a former Super Store shopper with a devil-may-care budget, now harvesting home-grown produce from their own garden plot; a former mansion owner, now living in a Tiny House.

“Tiny House” isn’t merely a reference to a house that is small; it’s a category, like “Condo”, or “Apartment.” “Tiny House” has become part of the conversation for people looking for affordable real estate, people looking for a scaled-down lifestyle- no gas guzzler, no shopping spree, no wasted living space.

A Tiny House is smaller than a shotgun house, a cabin, or a guest house; smaller than your garage. A Tiny House is so small, as my friend Ken DuVall would say, you have to go outside to change your mind.

A Tiny House is the size of a shed, typically 250 square feet or less. But it has everything. The kitchen is there, the bathroom, the bedroom, the living area. The people who buy, build, and live in Tiny Houses tend to pour their heart and soul and creative flair into their design, construction, and decoration. You have your Cape Cod, your Victorian, and your California Craftsman. You have your high ceilings, your natural lighting, and your energy efficiency. You have your low, low, low, utility costs.

People who buy, build, and live in Tiny Houses tend to say things like, “Living small emphasizes home life over home maintenance.” And “The McMansion way of life is wasteful and expensive. We need to recognize what fills a home when the excess is cut away. Living small can free up your mind, your wallet and your soul.”

Jim and Julie Wrenlich bought a five-acre sloping lot in the California foothills. It has pines, oaks, and manzanita, and came with an old manufactured home. They chose a spot just uphill from the existing homesite and cleared a small area to build their Tiny Home. They built a cabin-design, 220 square feet, tall-ceilinged with a loft, steep roof with green metal roofing and dormer, and a covered front porch and deck. Underneath, between the floor and the sloping ground, is storage.

“We bought the land for $45,000 and built the house for $25,000, including permits and fees,” says Jim. “We sold off the manufactured home for $8,000, so we’re in the whole thing for just over $60,000.” A construction loan paid for the project. “Our payment is lower than our rent was,” says Julie, “and we have a brand new home. We couldn’t afford to buy a regular house, and this is better, anyway.”

Logan and Tammy Strobel live in a to-go version of the Tiny House, 128 square feet on wheels, built on an 8’x16’ trailer. It’s a tall, cedar-sided beauty, fully self-contained, with an alcohol-burning stove, composting toilet, walls insulated with natural wool. “We designed our home”, says Logan, “and it fits us like tailored clothes.” Good thing it’s a to-go version, because it went. They towed their Tiny House from Portland, Oregon to Mt. Shasta in Northern California to be nearer Tammy’s family and her ill father. They parked it on country property owned by family, instantly right at home. A garden hose and an electrical cord from the pump house did the trick for utilities.

The simpler life, the less expensive life; the smaller impact lifestyle: all part of the Tiny House phenomenon. If you’re ready to give up the man-cave and the lady-lair, the maintenance and the bills; the entertainment theater, the bonus rooms and frills; you too can leave a smaller footprint. You could make it Tiny.

Big Shot

I attended a big high-level conference in Washington, D.C. where people-in-the-know delivered the news on the U.S. economy. Bankers, investors, and government representatives were rubbing elbows, shaking hands, and generally having a great time. When real estate became the subject of discussion I jumped right in with both ears.

For all the participation I contributed, I might as well have been miles away. Truth be told, I was indeed miles away. I was in California, staring at my computer screen witnessing the goings-on in Washington, D.C., via a “webinar.” I (and many others I assume) loomed above the conference in a sort of cyber-gallery, watching the bigwigs hobnob.

The real estate portion of the conference boiled down to this:

Real Estate isn’t as hot as it’s been cracked up to be. Reports of double-digit price increases are true, and people have been expressing worries of another housing bubble, but set those worries aside.

“We are of the view that housing is continuing to grow, but we are not of the view that it is robust,” said the FHA guy. He said real estate is not the economic driver it was a decade ago. Yes, home prices have moved upward quickly, but those gains are just a bounce-back from the severe drops of the recent past. Home builders are on the scene buying lots and building, but they’re going about it cautiously. Building-related jobs are a slow-grow, and land-buying is minimal, so construction hasn’t been the big economic driver we might expect. He said when construction picks up momentum, it still won’t hit the frenzy of the boom years; jobs will be fewer than might be expected, too.

Rising interest rates will not shut down housing and economic recovery. Fannie Mae economists did a study recently on the correlation between a sharp increase in mortgage interest rates and rising home prices. Their study shows there is little relationship there. When interest rates go up, the number of home sales may go down, but prices are still likely to keep rising.

As a result of their study they were also very confident-sounding in making this prediction: “We don’t necessarily expect interest rates to surge again, and we don’t think any rate rises will be as sudden as we‘ve seen.”

It is a really great time to buy. Even though housing prices have bounced up from their floor of a few years ago, they are still down. Even though interest rates have moved up recently, they are still extremely low compared to historic norms. Buyers have it good.

The American Dream is alive. Homeownership rates have fallen significantly from the boom years, and after the financial crisis, some prognosticators predicted America would become a predominately rental society. But the economists at this conference say many people who are renters now are the same people who lost their homes in foreclosure and short sales, and those people will buy again. In our society, the drive to become a homeowner remains unchanged.

I returned home from the conference without difficulty, and overall it was a good journey. It’s handy when you can leave your seat, open your own refrigerator, and sing out loud, while still hobnobbing with the bigwigs.

Easy

A big whoop went up when the announcement was made: “Quantitative Easing to continue!”

I called a finance expert.

“What is Quantitative Easing?” I asked.

“A form of Communism,” she said. “It’s Socialism, at the very least.”

She told me Quantitative Easing is a Federal Reserve tactic to manipulate private financial markets; the Fed is printing money it doesn’t have and playing loose with the cash, giving people the false impression of a strong economy so they’ll borrow more money and buy more stuff.

“And furthermore,” she said, “Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke is like the Wizard of Oz. He hides behind his smokescreen curtain and bellows grand proclamations that send people scattering in fear.”

For example, she told me, Bernanke recently hinted that it may be time to “taper down” Quantitative Easing. That hint was perceived as a proclamation fearful enough to send people scattering from the stock market like the Cowardly Lion, and to send interest rates skyward.

“So how does Quantitative Easing work?” I asked.

The Fed buys up bonds and securities, she told me, to keep them at an inflated value, which lowers interest rates. She said the Fed has been spending $85 billion a month on buying these bonds and securities.

She said when the Fed pulls out of the bonds and securities market, people will be left holding the bag, interest rates will soar, people will lose jobs, and we’ll suffer runaway inflation.

“The Fed calls it ‘stimulus,’ she said. “I call it ridiculous!”

I called another finance expert.

“Look,” he said, “Quantitative Easing has built our economy back up from the devastation of the financial collapse of 2008. The point of the program is to lower long-term interest rates, so people can afford housing loans. Housing is the engine that drives the creation of jobs and economic vitality.”

He said Quantitative Easing has stabilized our economy because people believe in the Federal Reserve’s management of interest rates.

“Quantitative Easing is responsible for a better housing market, more jobs, and a rising stock market,” he said, “and I’m glad the Fed decided to continue it. Ben Bernanke should get a lot of credit for keeping a steady hand.”

I told him Bernanke had been compared to the Wizard of Oz.

“More like Clark Kent,” he said, “with an “S” on his undershirt.”

“S” is for ‘Stimulus’ no doubt.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started